space exploration and the awesomeness of patriarchy

Just a couple of weeks after my post on the end of the Space Age comes this article by Marcie Bianco whining that space exploration is patriarchal.

Well of course it is Marcie. Space exploration is patriarchal, just as the whole of science and technology is patriarchal. It’s all part of the awesomeness of patriarchy.

These are essentially masculine pursuits. The urge to explore, to invent, to understand the physical world, to conquer new frontiers, these are masculine imperatives. That’s how civilisation has progressed from living in caves and chasing mammoths with pointy sticks to living in nice houses with lots of appliances (like the one Marcie lives in) and being able to drive to the supermarket to buy everything we need. That’s why Marcie doesn’t have to spend her day gathering nuts and berries and can sit in air-conditioned comfort reading up on the latest advances in Women’s Studies.

Had it not been for the patriarchy Marcie could never have had a career teaching social justice in American universities because there would not have been any American universities. America would never have been colonised. There’s a reason that it was Christopher Columbus who reached America in 1492, and not Christine Columbus. Exploring is what men do.

There’s also a reason why the first successful aircraft was built by the Wright Brothers, and not the Wright Sisters. And why the first successful locomotive was built by Robert Stephenson, not Roberta Stephenson. There’s a reason why electric lighting, cars, aircraft, radio, photography, motion pictures, television, refrigerators, steamships, railways and computers were invented by men. Even the inventions that have done so much to make life easier for women like Marcie, like the vacuum cleaner, microwave ovens and automatic washing machines, were invented by men.

The scientific discoveries that made such inventions possible were made overwhelmingly by men.

This is how the male brain works. Men like to figure out how stuff works, how things that are impossible today can be made possible tomorrow, they like to discover things and to explore, they like to find new frontiers. Women’s brains don’t work that way. Which is OK, women’s brains are not supposed to work that way because women are supposed to be at home looking after the kids and getting dinner ready while their husbands confront the world.

Of course it’s possible that women like Marcie do understand all this at some level. They do understand that the contribution of women to science and technology has been minuscule. That’s why they’re angry. Men are so much better at this stuff and it’s not fair. Men get real degrees in real subjects, not degrees in Women’s Studies.

If Marcie had been around in 1492 I’m sure she would have been lobbying Ferdinand and Isabella to cut off funding to Columbus for his silly patriarchal plan to reach the Indies and instead use the money to fund Women’s Studies workshops.

We should go to Mars because if we don’t it’s another sign that we’ve given up, that we’ve surrendered to women like Marcie.


6 comments on “space exploration and the awesomeness of patriarchy

  1. Amfortas says:

    One of your best 🙂 You should put your blog on FB. I shall 'bump' this one for you.

  2. James Higham says:

    Just patriarchally and evilly blogreading at the moment.

  3. Shaun F says:

    The reason women like Marcie are angry is because of envy.

  4. Well, you do realize, of course, that Marcie could probably respond to this, saying that men achieved all those things because they're successful not at what they did but at supressing and exploiting women, and if that wasn't so for all these centuries, women would've achieved no less or even more? 🙂 What would your response be to this logic of Marcie's?

  5. dfordoom says:

    that Marcie could probably respond to this, saying that men achieved all those things because they're successful not at what they did but at surpassing and exploiting women, and if that wasn't so for all these centuries, women would've achieved no less or even more?

    My answer would be that women have been free to contribute to science and technology for more than half a century now. Their contributions have been minimal. They haven't produced any female Albert Einsteins, or Thomas Edisons, or Henry Fords. We haven't seen an extraordinary female-led explosion in science and technology. So even given the opportunities they just don't achieve in those areas.

    Feminists can't point to any dynamic high-tech matriarchal societies as counter-examples because no matriarchal society has even been able to survive in the long term, much less thrive.

  6. But to this, Marcie can just endlessly repeat that women still has not enough opportunities, because one can't really measure just how much exactly do you need to achieve this or that. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s