the war between the sexes: the aftermath

Ever since the evil ideology known as feminism emerged men and women have been at war. In my view there is no way the conflict between the sexes can be resolved. So what does the future hold?
This is purely a personal view, but I suspect we will see an almost complete separation of the sexes. Our society will in fact be two societies, one male and one female, with very little real contact between the two. Men and women will lead totally separate lives.
When they’re in their 20s women will use men for sex. When they hit their mid-30s they’ll hear that biological clock ticking and they’ll panic and they’ll have one child and the state will raise the child. Marriage will be out of the question. They will have left it too late, and no man is going to want to marry a bitter angry 35-year-old feminist who has spent the previous twenty years treating men like dirt.
Men will increasingly opt out. There’s no upside whatsoever to marriage from a male point of view. You’d have to be insane even to contemplate such foolishness. Men in their 20s might hook up with women for casual sex but even that will increasingly be seen as not worth the misery and the aggravation. Within twenty years or so men will get most of their sex from sex robots. That’s an idea that has been around in science fiction for decades but the technology is catching up with the science fiction.
There are animal species in which the males and females have little or nothing to do with each other. They come together briefly once a year to mate and that’s it. That’s going to be the future for humans as well, except that we probably won’t even bother with the mating part.
Eventually men will figure out that they’re paying all the bills. Women mostly don’t have productive jobs. They work in the bureaucracy or in the “service” sector, in nice comfortable air-conditioned offices where they don’t get their hands dirty and they can spend their time drinking coffee and having meetings. They don’t actually produce wealth for the country. Men do that. When men realise that they’re producing the nation’s wealth whilst women are simply consuming that wealth things could get interesting. Men will discover that if they can’t find the kinds of jobs that allow them to keep their income (in other words jobs where they are paid under the counter) then there’s not much point in working at all. Women, who increasingly control the bureaucracy, will make frantic efforts to prevent men from keeping their income.
Both men and women will face the prospect of long long years of loneliness in the second half of life. Women will have their cats. Men will have porn and beer and gaming. All will be lonely but the relations between the sexes have been so irretrievably poisoned by feminism that will all live out their lonely lives in solitude.
I don’t see any chance of fixing any of this. The damage done by feminism has been so severe that any kind of truce seems unlikely. In all probability relations between the sexes will continue to deteriorate. We’ll end up with a kind of sexual apartheid. Two mutually hostile societies existing side by side in steadily increasing incomprehension and suspicion.
Of course in western Europe things are likely to go in a different direction. Islam will sweep feminism aside as if it had never existed.

the future of Europe: liberal or Islamic?

Assuming that Muslims go on increasing as a proportion of the population in western Europe it’s obvious that eventually there will have to be a showdown. Islam and liberalism are mutually incompatible belief systems. The question is, which system will win?
The European elites are sure that liberalism will win out, and that within a generation or two Muslims will become atheist liberals. The elites are composed of people who simply cannot comprehend religious belief. It is inconceivable to them that anyone, faced with the choice between actual religion and the prevailing secular religion of hedonism and consumerism, could possibly choose religion. The elites are sure that Islam will gradually fade away the way Christianity did. If the elites are wrong about this they are in big big trouble.
The other possibility is that Islam triumphs. In a recent comment at Oz Conservative Mark suggested that if Islam wins elite women will convert to Islam because they have zero commitment to Christianity. That is certainly possible. I can imagine quite a few liberals, especially the ones who dominate the media, bureaucracy and academia, converting because basically they’re people who are willing to adopt any set of beliefs that will help their careers and allow them to curry favour with the people who really run things. Because liberals in the media, bureaucracy and academia might think of themselves as being members of the elite they aren’t really – they’re just members of the Outer Party. And the Inner Party members are not going to give up their devotion to their chosen religion – the pursuit of power and money.
The problem with this scenario is that it’s not going to be very attractive to the Inner Party. The super-rich globalists of the Inner Party want a population that is docile and easily controlled and that will fulfill its allotted functions – which means a population dedicated to hedonism and consumerism. An Islamic population is unlikely to be docile and easily controlled and is unlikely to dedicate itself to hedonism and consumerism. And that would be a threat to the profits and to the power of the global capitalists. That would mean that the elites would have to take active steps to undermine and ultimately to destroy Islam. They would use the same methods that were so successful in destroying Christianity.
Liberalism is essential to global capitalism because it is the one belief system perfectly suited to producing a population of compliant mindless consumers.
Islam is not likely to submit as meekly as Christianity did. The stage would be set for another culture war but this time it’s not going to be a cold war – it’s going to be a very hot war.
Islam and liberalism cannot co-exist in the long term. One must destroy the other. I don’t believe that Islam and capitalism (at least capitalism of the sort that currently dominates the planet) are compatible either.
Christians and social conservatives will therefore face a choice. We can watch from the sidelines, or we can enlist as allies on one side or the other. We’re in the same situation that small nations are in when Great Powers start assembling alliances in preparation for war, having to choose which alliance to join and desperately hoping to choose the winning side. Islam and liberalism are the ideological superpowers. We’re one of the minor powers but our very survival depends on making the right choice. If we stay on the sidelines we’re not going to be very popular with either side.
My own view is that liberalism is by nature totalitarian. Liberals will not stop until every Christian and every social conservative has been hunted down and sent to a re-education camp (and a re-education camp is the best we can hope for). In the long term liberalism intends to stamp out every single ember of dissent. Under triumphal liberalism we have no future at all.
As for Islam, it’s a crap shoot. We might get lucky and find ourselves living under a reasonably tolerant Islamic regime. Or we might get something like Saudi Arabia.
Sometimes in life you have a number of choices but the trouble is they’re all bad.

choose your enemies carefully – Islam vs liberalism

It is clear that western civilisation faces two great threats. On the one hand there is Islam, on the other there is the liberal-feminist-homosexual-green death cult. The question is, which is the more dangerous enemy?
Many conservatives seem to view Islam as the more immediate threat. They may well be quite wrong. The fact is that there would be no Islamic threat in the first place had the liberal-feminist-homosexual-green death cult not destroyed the west’s will to live. The root cause of all the west’s problems is the triumph of cultural marxism. It is the despair, the self-loathing, the nihilism, the atheism and the degeneracy promoted by cultural marxism that has brought us to the brink of civilisational collapse. If western civilisation is to survive we need to get our priorities right. The destruction of cultural marxism must be the first objective.
In achieving this objective our most powerful ally may well be Islam. The only force in the modern world that seems at all likely to oppose the cultural marxist agenda is Islam.
Perhaps we should be hoping to see Islamic republics established as quickly as possible in countries like Sweden, the Netherlands, Britain and France. That might serve to concentrate the minds of Americans, Canadians, Australians and eastern Europeans. Eastern Europe is still predominantly Christian. The establishment of a caliphate in western Europe might persuade the eastern Europeans that perhaps it’s not a good idea to abandon Christianity, patriotism and self-respect.
It is not at all clear to me why social conservatives and conservative Christians should shed any tears over the imposition of sharia law in liberal cesspits like Sweden or the Netherlands. If it’s a choice between living under sharia law or living under the heel of the feminists I’m inclined to think that sharia law might well be preferable. Of course it might mean that women would lose their most precious right, the right to murder their unborn babies. Homosexuals might lose their most precious right, the right to spread their poison in the school system. 
The imposition of Islamic republics in western Europe might also hasten the demise of the European Union. That can only be a good thing.
The western Europeans have after all chosen their fate. Enoch Powell warned the British nearly half a century ago of the consequences of unrestricted immigration. They ignored him. The British, the French, the Swedes and the Dutch do still have a choice. They can vote against the political establishments. They do have alternative parties for which they can vote. If the French choose to reject the FN in the next presidential election then they have chosen their fate. If the Swedes choose to reject the Sweden Democrats they too will have chosen their fate. If the British choose a clown like Ed Milliband or David Cameron in their next general election they too will have voluntarily chosen self-destruction. In those circumstances they richly deserve the fate in store for them. The good news is that Islamification might be the prelude to the destruction of the liberal-feminist-homosexual-green death cult. If that is the only means by which that death cult can be destroyed then it might not be such a bad thing.
There is certainly no reason for genuine conservatives to lift a finger to save liberal atheism from Islam, or to save feminism from sharia law. 
I am no apologist for Islam. I would prefer western civilisation to survive, but it cannot survive so long as it nourishes within it the cancers of feminism, the radical homosexual agenda, atheism, nihilism, despair and degeneracy.

the liberal-feminist death cult

There’s been a lot of talk in the past few years about Islam as a death cult. While Islam certainly has quite a bit of innocent blood on its hands, consider this. There are 3,000 abortions a day performed in the US. Islamic terrorists recently murdered a dozen people in Paris. In 2012 more than 220,000 abortions were carried out in France. If we’re looking for a death cult perhaps we’re looking in the wrong place?
Apart from this horrifying slaughter of the innocents the liberal-feminist death cult in the western world has all but destroyed marriage, causing untold misery for those children lucky enough not to be aborted. The same liberal-feminist death cult encourages thousands of people to undergo surgical mutilation in the pathetically deluded belief that they can somehow change their biological sex. The same death cult encourages the spreading of homosexual propaganda in schools.
This same death cult has undermined belief in all of the worthwhile traditions that made western civilisation great. Perhaps this is not quite genocide, but it’s pretty close to it. It’s certainly cultural genocide. 
I am not arguing in favour of Islam. I am merely pointing out that the self-hating self-destructive west is hardly in a position to claim the moral high ground.
Thousands of people in western countries convert to Islam every year. Given the west’s rush to cultural suicide this is hardly surprising. 
Any talk of resisting the Islamisation of Europe is just so much hot air as long as the liberal-feminist death cult remains firmly in control. Unless that death cult can be overcome there can be no hope. Even without the threat of Islam European civilisation will still be doomed to destruction. The enemy within is far more dangerous than any external threat.

Rotherham, Islam and the decay of western civilisation

Peter Frost in his recent post at UNZ Review has some interesting things to say about the Rotherham scandal. I disagree with much of what he says but he does make some valid and pertinent points. 
It’s obviously crystal clear that the main problems are the catastrophic policies of multi-culturalism and mass Third World immigration but I think Frost is right in believing that there are other things going on here as well. It does seem as if many immigrants (especially Muslim immigrants)  are assimilating, but in dangerously wrong ways – that they are adopting the very worst aspects of our own rapidly collapsing civilisation while at the same time maintaining the very worst features of their own cultures. They are embracing the mindless hedonism, the obsession with sex, the nihilism, the victimology and the identity politics. From their own cultures they are maintaining the contempt for outsiders.
They are also taking advantage of the disintegration of the family unit in western culture, which has led to so many teenage girls becoming virtually victims waiting to be happen. 
These immigrants are also taking advantage of their knowledge that the police (especially in the UK but also to a large extent across the western world) are always going to take the side of non-whites against whites. The few fathers of victimised white girls who tried to get something done about the problem found themselves being arrested. 
The net result of all this is that for the mainly Pakistani grooming gangs their horrendous activities were made ridiculously easy, and almost risk-free.
Frost also makes the point that other non-white groups apart from Muslims are over-represented in these kinds of crimes. 
Islam and immigration are certainly major parts of the problem but unless we can address the serious failures of our own civilisation we can expect many more Rotherhams.

freedom of speech and dangerous ideas

Uthman Badar, a spokesman for Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, was to given a lecture at the Sydney Opera House as part of the so-called Festival of Dangerous Ideas. The subject of his lecture was to be “Honour killings are morally justified” – certainly a provocative enough title. After predictable howls of outrage the lecture has been cancelled

What depresses me about all this is that many conservatives are expressing delight that the lecture has been cancelled. None of those who reacted with outrage to the proposed lecture know precisely what arguments Mr Badar intended to use at his lecture. The furore that erupted had nothing to do with the lecture’s content. The title was enough.
The problem with this is that we can’t have it both ways. Conservative speakers are frequently silenced by the same methods used against Mr Badar – a campaign of hysteria in the media, and more particularly on social media. If we as conservatives truly believe in freedom of speech we have to be consistent, and we have to recognise the rights of people to express views that we may find extremely repugnant. That’s what freedom of speech is all about. Freedom to express opinions that may offend, outrage, anger and provoke many people. You either believe in freedom of speech or you don’t. If you do then you have to see the silencing of Mr Badar as yet another infringement on freedom of speech.

It’s quite likely that, given the opportunity to hear his arguments, I would find myself disagreeing very strongly indeed with Mr Badar. No having been given the opportunity, I can’t say for certain. No matter how strongly I might disagree with him I still believe he has the right to be heard.

It seems that freedom of speech is still the most dangerous idea of them all.

a truly bizarre alliance

If you want evidence of the deep irrationality that pervades the world today you have only to look at Jewish responses to the rise of nationalist parties in Europe.
For example, this bizarre story in the Jerusalem Post – 

Stupidity on this scale simply defies belief. The Jews are to serve the role of useful idiots, helping to keep parties of the Left in power, parties that are committed to aiding and abetting the Islamification of Europe. And they have somehow convinced themselves that this will end well for them? They genuinely believe that this will make Moslems well-disposed towards them?
From the Moslem point of view it’s a clever short-term strategy. Anything that helps to keep left-leaning parties in power will allow them to continue to build up their numbers until they are in a position to consolidate their invasion of Europe. After that they will turn on those leftist parties and their treatment of the Jews will become even more savage than it already is. 
It’s a classic case of learning the wrong lessons from history. The Nazis were right-wing, therefore all right-wingers must be Nazis. This conveniently ignores the fact that the Nazis were not right-wing. National Socialism was an ideology of the Left. 
It also ignores the fact that the new European nationalist parties are the only ones prepared to take a stand against religious violence, which makes them in reality natural allies of the Jews. 
Most Jews however seem to be incapable of understanding that Europeans have a right to be nationalists, just as Israel has a right to be a nationalist state. The most dangerous enemy of European nationalism is Islam, just as the most dangerous enemy of the Jews is Islam.
It makes one wonder if Jews are really as smart as we’ve been led to believe.